contents go

KDI - Korea Development Institute

KDI - Korea Development Institute

SITEMAP

HOT ISSUE

Policy Study Economic Preferences in Korea: Domain-Specific Determinants and Their Policy Implications February 28, 2026

표지

Series No. 2026-04

Policy Study KOR Economic Preferences in Korea: Domain-Specific Determinants and Their Policy Implications #General(Other) #General Economics Education
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.22740/kdi.ps.2026.04 P-ISBN979-11-7566-175-2 E-ISBN979-11-7566-179-0

February 28, 2026

  • 프로필
    Jaejoon Lee
  • KDI
    CHOI, Hyung-jae
Summary
Economic preferences underpin saving, insurance, and cooperative behavior, and pension, tax, and financial policies implicitly presuppose a particular distribution of them. To our knowledge, no Korean dataset has measured time discounting, risk attitudes, and reciprocity jointly for the same respondents. Using the 2025 KDI Survey on Public Attitudes toward Economic Preferences (N=1,628), this study estimates the determinants of all three domains and reads the resulting patterns against a contrast between a strategic mechanism―adaptation to objective conditions―and a normative mechanism―the operation of social role identity.

Three findings emerge. First, the determinants of time discounting diverge by horizon: the five-year rate responds to objective resource conditions such as income, debt, and age, while at the one-year horizon the marginal explanatory power of income and debt weakens and variables of self-regulation and identity―the form of saving held and social role―take their place. Second, risk attitudes are governed by gender, education, income, and financial literacy, with social role variables adding no significant explanatory power. Third, allocation-game responses cluster at the equal split, and the share of respondents answering identically rises monotonically with education, making it difficult to read this clustering as an expression of reciprocity preference alone.

The policy implication lies in matching behavioral mechanisms to policy instruments. For long-horizon discounting and risk attitudes, the evidence points to altering objective conditions―income stability, asset accumulation, and relief of debt burdens. The study's contribution is to document that determinant patterns differ systematically across the three domains and to make that difference usable in the choice of policy instruments.
Contents
Abstract (ENG)
Preface
Summary (KOR)

Chapter 1 Introduction
 Section 1. Background and Problem Statement
 Section 2. Analytical Framework and Data

Chapter 2 Theoretical Background
 Section 1. Challenges to the Assumption of Exogenous Preferences
 Section 2. Theoretical Framework of the Two Mechanisms
 Section 3. Theoretical Examination on Determinants of Time Discounting
 Section 4. Theoretical Examination on Determinants of Risk Attitudes
 Section 5. Theoretical Examination on Reciprocity and Resource Allocation Games
 Section 6. Overview of Empirical Analysis

Chapter 3 Data and Measurement
 Section 1. Issues in Preference Measurement
 Section 2. Data Sources and Sample Design
 Section 3. Behavioral Measurement: Staircase Comparison Survey
 Section 4. Significance of Self-Reported Measures
 Section 5. Reciprocity Measurement: Surveying Resource Allocation Games
 Section 6. Overview of Analytical Methodology

Chapter 4 Determinants of Time Discounting and Risk Attitudes
 Section 1. Analysis Data and Regression Specifications
 Section 2. Determinants of Time Discounting
 Section 3. Determinants of Risk Attitudes
 Section 4. Comparison of Determinant Patterns Across Two Domains

Chapter 5 Response Patterns and Analysis of Resource Allocation Games
 Section 1. Theoretical Background and Measurement Environment of Resource Allocation Games
 Section 2. Diagnosis of Response Distributions
 Section 3. Determinants of Deviation from Equal Split
 Section 4. Within-Subject Difference Analysis: Determinants of UG-DG Differences

Chapter 6 Policy Implications and Conclusion
 Section 1. Synthesis of Analytical Results
 Section 2. Theoretical Status of Strategic and Normative Mechanisms
 Section 3. Policy Implications: Alignment Between Mechanisms and Means
 Section 4. Policy Infrastructure for Reciprocity Measurement
 Section 5. Limitations of Data and Design
 Section 6. Conclusion

References
Appendix
related materials ( 9 )
  • Key related materials
Join our Newsletter

World's Leading Think Tank, Korea Development Institute

Security code

We reject unauthorized collection of email addresses posted on our website by using email address collecting programs or other technical devices. To access the email address, please type in the characters exactly as they appear in the box below.

captcha
KDI Staff Information

Please enter the security code to prevent unauthorized information collection.

KDI Staff Information

Please check the contact information.

OK
KDI Staff Information

Please check the contact information.

OK